Background & Purpose

The proposals were submitted to address concerns about how government agencies operate, including their use of technology and their role as employers. The goal was to debate and potentially improve the efficiency and structure of the state administration.

Proposals & Debate

The 37 motions covered a wide range of topics, including how to better manage state agencies, the need for improved digital tools and IT systems, and how the state handles its properties and staff. The opposition argued for specific reforms, while the government and the committee maintained that current ongoing work is sufficient.

The Decision

The parliament decided to say no to all 37 proposals, choosing to keep the current system where agencies have the freedom to organize their own work.

Does this affect you?

  • State agency employees: Their daily work environment and organizational structure remain unchanged by this parliamentary decision.
  • Public sector managers: They retain the authority to organize their agency's operations as they see fit to meet societal needs.

In Practice

  • No new laws or regulations were introduced as a result of these motions.
  • State agencies will continue to manage their own internal organization.
  • Ongoing projects regarding digitalization and administration will continue as planned without new parliamentary directives.
  • The state's role as an employer remains unchanged by this decision.